Our Case Results
  • Dave & Busters
  • VM Ware
  • Toys R Us
  • Ruth's Chris Steakhouse
  • Red Robbin
  • Patina Restaurants
  • Panda Express
  • Outback Steakhouse
  • Lending Tree
  • Kraft
  • DST
  • Cisco
  • Burlington
  • Big Lots
  • Bank of America

Achieving Results That Make a Difference

At the Carter Law Firm, our Newport Beach attorneys strike a balance between compassionate client service and strong, results-driven representation. We’re motivated to succeed in your employment law-related matter. Call now.

One look at our case results will show just how dedicated our Newport Beach attorneys are to achieving results for our clients facing employment law-related issues. We’ve won more than $250 million in the last 10 years and are showing no signs of stopping for our clients in need. At the Carter Law Firm, we believe you deserve justice when your rights are violated. Call us at (949) 239-0419 or contact us online to speak with a passionate team member today – we serve clients throughout California.

  • $20,000,000
    Cisco
    Plaintiff filed a complaint against Cisco, a worldwide manufacturer and provider of information technology services who employs several "engineers" that were allegedly classified as "salary exempt" irrespective of their duties or daily tasks. This ...
  • $17,375,000
    Confidential Defendant
    The Carter Law Firm represented hundreds of oil field and refinery workers at one of the largest oil companies in the country. While the workers were told they were being provided with rest breaks, the rest breaks were in fact a fiction because the ...
  • $16,650,000
    Bank of America
    A class action was filed on behalf of current and former mortgage loan officers of Bank of America against Bank of America National Association alleging violation of California laws by failing to reimburse mortgage loan officers for business ...
  • $9,600,000
    Abercrombie & Fitch
    The Carter Law Firm pursued this case, alleging that retail store employees throughout California were not properly compensated for “call in” shifts. The employer had a practice whereby employees were expected to call their manager one hour prior to ...
  • $7,500,000
    Toys 'R' Us
    Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Toys 'R' Us, Inc. (a US toy store chain) on behalf of themselves and all employees similarly situated. The Complaint alleged failure to pay wages for off the clock time, meal and rest period violations, and ...
  • $6,900,000
    Verizon Wireless
    The Carter Law Firm pursued claims on behalf of over 7,000 California employees in the wireless phone industry who collectively received over 180,000 incorrect itemized wage statements. The subject paystubs failed to provide accurate information in ...
  • $6,500,000
    Big Lots
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Big Lots Stores (the nation's largest broadline closeout retailer) on behalf of herself and all persons working as non-exempt employees who performed services in California during or after the four-year period ...
  • $4,850,000
    Sprint
    The Carter Law Firm brought this wage and hour class action lawsuit on behalf of 1,796 current employees and 3,221 former employees against a large mobile phone retail establishment. The case alleged that the employer failed to provide required meal ...
  • $2,362,100
    Paramount
    The Carter Law Firm brought a case on behalf of hourly and salaried mortgage industry underwriters, alleging failure to pay overtime wages, failure to provide required meal and rest breaks, failure to provide proper itemized wage statements, and ...
  • $1,995,000
    Bed Bath & Beyond
    The Carter Law Firm brought a class action case against one of California’s largest home retailers on behalf of three types of managers (department managers, assistant managers and senior managers) all of whom were paid hourly. The case alleged that ...
  • $6,500,000
    VMWare
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against VMWARE (a worldwide IT product distributor who employs several "engineers" that were allegedly classified as "salary exempt" irrespective of their duties or daily tasks) on behalf of himself (a QA Engineer) and all ...
  • $3,250,000
    Panda Express
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Panda Express (the fastest growing Chinese restaurant chain in North America) on behalf of current and former employees. The Complaint included causes of action for violation of Labor Code section 226.7 for failing ...
  • $2,500,000
    Lending Tree
    Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Lending Tree (an online marketplace of lenders where consumers can complete a loan request and compare offers from competing lenders) on behalf of loan officers, mortgage bankers, equity specialists, and any ...
  • $2,400,000
    Patina
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against The Patina Group, LLC., (a bicoastal boutique restaurant and food service company) on behalf of current and former non-exempt employees. The Complaint sought damages, penalties and remedies for failure to provide ...
  • $2,000,000
    KRAFT
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Kraft Foods on behalf of herself and others similarly situated as a representative of the Settlement Class. Plaintiff alleged failure to provide meal periods or compensation in lieu thereof, failure to provide rest ...
  • $2,000,000
    Outback Steakhouse
    Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against T-Bird Restaurant Group, Inc. "Outback Steakhouse" (an Australian steakhouse restaurant) on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The Complaint alleged failure to allow meal periods and rest ...
  • $2,000,000
    Ruth's Chris
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Red Robin International, Inc. (a chain of casual dining restaurants headquartered in Colorado) on behalf of himself and all California restaurant employees of Defendant Red Robin. The Complaint alleged failure to ...
  • $1,800,000
    Burlington Coat Factory
    A class action was filed on behalf of current and former Burlington Coat Factory employees. The Complaint alleged failure to pay for off the clock security checks as well as failure to provide adequate meal and rest breaks. Carter Law Firm helped ...
  • $1,250,000
    DST Output
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against DST Output, a leading provider of paper and electronic documents for customer communications, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. The plaintiff alleged unpaid wages (Fair Labor Standards Act of ...
  • $1,190,000
    Dave and Busters
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Dave and Busters, Inc. (an American restaurant and entertainment business headquartered in Dallas, Texas) on behalf of herself and all non-exempt employees. Plaintiff alleged failure to accurately pay all employees ...
  • $1,100,000
    Babies-R-Us
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against First Franklin Financial Corporation (an employer of loan brokers and located in San Jose) on behalf of herself and others in the class. Plaintiff alleged failure to compensate First Franklin wholesale funders for ...
  • $820,000
    Red Robin
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Red Robin International, Inc. (a chain of casual dining restaurants headquartered in Colorado) on behalf of himself and all current and former exempt California restaurant managers who were paid on an other than ...
  • $750,000
    Lone Star Steakhouse
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The complaint contained causes of action for failure to pay overtime compensation, unlawful business practices, failure to provide ...
  • $650,000
    Hollister
    Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Hollister Co. (an American lifestyle brand operated by Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) individually and on behalf of the class. Plaintiff alleged mandatory purchase of uniforms, failure to provide rest and meal breaks ...